- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:05:05 -0500
- To: Vincent.Quint@inrialpes.fr
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 17:40 +0200, Vincent Quint wrote: > All, > > The TAG f2f in Amherst is in 1 month now. It's time to start > preparing an agenda. I'll try to put together a first draft in the > next few days and I'd welcome your input. > > TAG members, please send me your thoughts. It may be the > issues from our issues list that are the most important for you, > or those on which you plan to work soon. It may also be new > issues that you would like to discuss. After looking over the list of draft findings http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/findings and such, I can see three trends, or focus areas: * state and security * semantic web architecture the "Abstract Component References" and "Associating Resources with Namespaces" findings seem to be part of this theme perhaps "URNs, Namespaces and Registries" too. * versioning and extensibility I suspect that we have bandwidth for only 1 out of the three on any given telcon and 2 out of the three for any sustained effort. I'd like to find a somewhat more narrow scope for the "The use of Metadata in URIs" and "URI Schemes and Web Protocols" findings. For the latter, perhaps "when to make a new URI scheme" and/or "some good and bad experiences with new URI schemes" discussing DAV:, tel:, mms:, jabber: ... hmm... and very nearby is "URNs, Namespaces and Registries". Maybe the doing story-telling around semantic-web architecture would clarify. Perhaps being customer/audience driven would help... audiences/customers that come to mind include: - the javascript/XML access control task force - mobile best practices WG Hmm... this is sort of a ramble that hasn't really come to any conclusion. I think I'll send it anyway... -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 10 May 2006 17:05:18 UTC