- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:12:23 -0500
- To: "Dan Connolly" <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, www-tag <www-tag@w3.org>
On 3/20/06, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > > https is still needed to inform the client that privacy > > is needed. Upgrade only removes the need for a separate port. I > > explained it in detail when BEEP had the same issue, but I don't know > > where the archives of that list went. > > Yet another reason to make this argument easier to find. No luck in the HTTP-WG archives, but here's a message by Roy on the BEEP list; http://drakken.dbc.mtview.ca.us/pipermail/beepwg/2001-June/001151.html which is part of this interesting thread; http://drakken.dbc.mtview.ca.us/pipermail/beepwg/2001-June/thread.html#1118 Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Monday, 20 March 2006 20:12:31 UTC