On 9 March, Dan wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-03-09 at 18:39 +0000, Misha Wolf wrote:
> [...]
> > I'm not sure whether we are misunderstanding each other or 
> > whether I am misunderstanding the GRDDL document [1].  The 
> > document is very terse, and I may be missing some context.  
> > Please clarify how one would construct a human-readable 
> > RDDL document containing links to GRDDL transform(s), among 
> > other resources.
> OK, I'll try to dig out my RDDL/GRDDL stuff and make an example.
> Meanwhile, this is supposed to be covered in a section of
> a TAG finding in progress... oh... you already foud it[2].
> Section 3.3 "Using GRDDL" doesn't answer your questions?

Either that draft TAG finding is broken or I'm missing something.

> Then perhaps we do need another example.

I don't think that another example will fix it.  There seems 
to be a conceptual gap here.  Why does the finding have a 
section called "3.3 Using GRDDL", which starts  with: 
"A third approach is to use [GRDDL]"?
Why is this a separate "approach"?  Why doesn't the finding 
simply offer a Purpose such as "Serves the purpose of conversion 
to RDF/XML"?

> To give a link from a namespace to a transformation
> for documents that use that namespace, GRDDL coins
> this URI:

So why isn't this included in the list of Purposes in the draft 

> GRDDL also coins 2 other URIs that can be used as RDDL
> purposes:


> > [1]
> > [2]

------------------- NewsML 2 resources ------------------------------        | |

To find out more about Reuters visit

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.

Received on Thursday, 9 March 2006 21:59:13 UTC