- From: Bullard, Claude L \(Len\) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2006 16:21:09 -0600
- To: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>, "Cutler, Roger \(RogerCutler\)" <RogerCutler@chevron.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
The problem with that example is it contrives HTML to be a programming language. It isn't. Simple examples that do not obtain rob a principle of its surface credibility. The fact that a principle is easily misapplied may mean it is inadequately formulated or its application context isn't common. That means it begs its reason to be included among general principles. As far as I can tell, this isn't a principle of the computer science of building web applications, but of politeness in a communicative context. Again, Grice's Maxims are equally applicable and better argued. len From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com I think it's easy to make the case that such pages would, at least in those senses, be less valuable than pages with similar content conveyed in HTML. This is a somewhat contrived example, in that few of us are tempted to build static pages entirely in JavaScript, but that's the point. In many cases, the Rule of Least Power brings you to solutions that have commonsense value. I think that if one looks to such obvious examples one may convince people that they are already acting on the Rule of Least Power. If so, maybe they can start to understand how the Rule might guide them toward useful decisions that they might not have made as well without it.
Received on Tuesday, 7 March 2006 22:21:12 UTC