- From: Bullard, Claude L \(Len\) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 16:19:02 -0500
- To: "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ihmc.us>, "Paul Prescod" <paul@prescod.net>
- Cc: "Harry Halpin" <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
In effect, you are saying that usage determines meaning, not architectural principles. A URI in a SemWeb doc is treated differently than when in other situations. Local system prevails. Ok but it means there is an operational disconnect between two applications of the same abstraction: the URI. It also means the advice from some to use URNs instead of HTTP URIs for namespaces is good advice. len From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Pat Hayes And the main point is that there is no actual *need* to put anything there in cases like this. The SWeb software which is designed to use URIs like this will never try to dereference them. That isn't what they are for.
Received on Wednesday, 28 June 2006 21:19:14 UTC