- From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:58:25 +0100
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Hi Steven, > > It is not the case that XML Namespaces dictates a particular > > method for building the IRI corresponding to an item in a > > namsepace. Indeed, XML Namespaces does not require that any > > such method exists. > Indeed. But in the rdf-in-xhtml-tf we are trying to be compatible > with other serializations of RDF. As you point out, RDF/XML uses > concatenation, as I believe does N3. That is why we were using it > in CURIES too, so that the same syntax means the same thing. And this is most probably a Good Thing. But I request that you distinguish between a spec for CURIEs in general, which should be written in such a way that it includes the various existing usages of foo:bar, and the RDFa spec in particular, which should explain how CURIEs will be used in XHTML. Misha ------------------- NewsML 2 resources ------------------------------ http://www.iptc.org | http://www.iptc.org/std-dev/NAR/1.0 http://www.iptc.org/std-dev | http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-2 To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 15:59:04 UTC