- From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:28:28 +0100
- To: public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, semantic-web@w3.org, www-tag@w3.org
Hi Steven, > Misha's proposal is at the moment just that: a proposal; I have > some sympathy for the ability to define separate methods for > concatenating the prefix and suffix of a CURIE (the XHTML > namespace, like so many, doesn't end in a slash or a hash, and so > using QNames I would have to learn to live with > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtmlindex for the 'index' rel rather than > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/index or > http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml#index), however, I currently prefer > the simplicity of just using concatenation. It is not the case that XML Namespaces dictates a particular method for building the IRI corresponding to an item in a namsepace. Indeed, XML Namespaces does not require that any such method exists. I quote from Architecture of the World Wide Web, Volume One, http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-webarch-20041215/ 4.5.3. XML namespaces The purpose of an XML namespace (defined in [XMLNS]) is to allow the deployment of XML vocabularies (in which element and attribute names are defined) in a global environment and to reduce the risk of name collisions in a given document when vocabularies are combined. For example, the MathML and SVG specifications both define the set element. [...] The use of URIs confers additional benefits. First, each URI/local name pair can be mapped to another URI, grounding the terms of the vocabulary in the Web. These terms may be important resources and thus it is appropriate to be able to associate URIs with them. [RDFXML] uses simple concatenation of the namespace URI and the local name to create a URI for the identified term. Other mappings are likely to be more suitable for hierarchical namespaces; see the related TAG issue abstractComponentRefs-37. An interesting TAG discussion is minuted at: TAG in Edinburgh 21 Sep 2005 Issue abstractComponentRefs-37 http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2005/09/21-tagmem-minutes.html Consequently, if the eventual CURIE spec mandates a particular construction method, it will cause XML Namespace QNames to not be a subset of CURIEs. I would consider such a choice to be a serious mistake. Misha ------------------- NewsML 2 resources ------------------------------ http://www.iptc.org | http://www.iptc.org/std-dev/NAR/1.0 http://www.iptc.org/std-dev | http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-2 To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2006 14:29:03 UTC