W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2006

RE: CURIEs: A proposal

From: Misha Wolf <Misha.Wolf@reuters.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 13:37:31 +0100
To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org, newsml-2@yahoogroups.com, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org
Message-id: <A29ADE959C70A1449470AA9A212F5D80020C9FD9@LONSMSXM06.emea.ime.reuters.com>

Hi Dan,

> [1] minutes of TAG ftf Wed 14 Jun, to appear

In the absence of [1] it is not possible for me to form a definite
opinion, but I have a strong feeling of mutual incomprehension.  
How can the TAG form an opinion on the URI construction rule in the 
absence of an overall architectural vision?  Maybe such a vision 
has been formulated and will emerge in [1].  I won't spend too much 
time on this now, as I'm acting on insufficient information, so 
will make just a few brief points:

-  For excellent reasons, there is no universal rule for how one 
   should construct the IRI for an element/attribute name from a 
   namespace IRI and a localname.  Is the TAG proposing that in 
   the case of attribute values alone, there should be a universal 

-  Even in the case of attribute values, languages may wish to 
   build URIs using "/" as the delimiter rather than "#".  How 
   can there be a single rule for all?

-  "airport:LGA" is just a string in the absence of language-
   specific rules, such as how the IRI-to-prefix mapping is 
   established.  QNames use xmlns for this purpose.  As I showed 
   in my Edinburgh presentation, NewsML 2 does not.  I have no 
   idea what SPARQL uses.

So, again, I'm asking for an overall architectural vision, and I 
refer you to my "CURIEs: A proposal", 2 June 2006:

------------------- NewsML 2 resources ------------------------------
http://www.iptc.org         | http://www.iptc.org/std-dev/NAR/1.0
http://www.iptc.org/std-dev | http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newsml-2

To find out more about Reuters visit www.about.reuters.com

Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the views of Reuters Ltd.
Received on Thursday, 15 June 2006 12:37:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:12 UTC