W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2006

Re: CURIEs: A proposal

From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 11:15:45 +0100
To: mark.birbeck@x-port.net
Cc: www-tag@w3.org, public-rdf-in-xhtml-tf@w3.org, newsml-2@yahoogroups.com
Message-ID: <f5bodx27hym.fsf@erasmus.inf.ed.ac.uk>

Hash: SHA1

Mark Birbeck writes:

> Secondly, and more importantly, I'm proposing that many current uses
> of QNames should actually be CURIEs, and we therefore need to ensure
> backwards compatibiliy. For example, in your own work, Henry, XML
> Schemas should not be using QNames to identify datatypes for use in
> other langauges, or to name simple and complex types in schema
> definitions. Equally, XPath functions should not be declared using
> QNames.

Sorry, I strongly disagree.  It's up to language designers to decide
whether they want to give things simple names, in namespaces, or not.
If the decide to do that, as XML Schema did for element and attribute
declarations and type definitions, or as XPath did for functions, then
QNames are the _correct_ short syntax, precisely because the semantics
of a QName is an expanded name, i.e. a name in a namespace.

- -- 
 Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
                     Half-time member of W3C Team
    2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
            Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
                   URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)

Received on Friday, 9 June 2006 10:16:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:12 UTC