- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:57:20 -0400
- To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ihmc.us>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OF275F6AAD.70BF5FE6-ON85257180.006D6EC2-85257180.006DCA0A@lotus.com>
(I'm leaving the tag-announce list off the distribution for this followup.) Pat Hayes writes: > Can you tell us, or point us to where it is told, what a > 'conceptual resource' is? The phrase does not seem to occur > anywhere else in the TAG issues list, and I have not seen it before. The new TAG issue entry [1] has a link to some of Tim's earlier writings on Generic Resources [2]. There Tim writes: "A URI represents a resource A "resource" is a conceptual entity (a little like a Platonic ideal). When represented electronically, a resource may be of the kind which corresponds to only one posisble bit stream representation. An example is the text version of an Internet RFC. That never changes. It will always ha the same checksum. On the other hand, a resource may be generic in that as a concept it is well specified but not so specifically specified that it can only be represented by a single bit stream. In this case, other URIs may exist which identify a resource more specifically. These other URIs identify resources too, and there is a relationship of genericity between the generic and the relatively specific resource. As an example, successively specific resources might be 1. The Bible 2. The Bible, King James Version 3. The Bible, KJV, in English 4. A particular ASCII rendering of the KJV Bible in English Each resource may have a URI. The authority which allocates the URI is the authority which determines wo what it refers: Therefore, that authority determines to what extent that resource is generic or specific. This model is more of an observation of a requirement than an implementation decision. Multilevel gnericity clarly exists in all our current life with books and electronic documents. Adoption of this model simply follows from the rule that Web design should not arbitrarily seek to constrain life in general for its own purposes." This quote from Tim doesn't use term "conceptual resource", but it does mention "conceptual entities" in a sense that I find at least informally suggestive of what we're trying to put on the table for discussion. Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#genericResources-53 [2] http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Generic -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Received on Thursday, 1 June 2006 19:57:45 UTC