RE: Where to discuss versioning finding (was: Re: http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning)

Well, there's 2 complicating factors:

One is that the Schema WG is having it's discussions on a member only
list and their documents are member only.  This makes it difficult for
to talk about versioning related schema 1.1 documents on a public list.
I've already had one comment about that.  

Second is that the purpose of the TAG finding has drastically changed
form xml-versioning to versioning.  I'm not sure that the xml-versioning
list should follow that transition as well.

Cheers,
Dave

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of
> noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
> Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 8:34 AM
> To: www-tag@w3.org
> Cc: Bryan Rasmussen
> Subject: Where to discuss versioning finding (was: Re:
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning)
> 
> 
> Hmm. I thought that, due to the shared interest in versioning, I.e.
among
> the TAG, the XML Schema WG and others, we had agreed to use
> public-xml-versioning@w3.org to discuss this draft finding, but I note
> that the draft currently says:  "Please send comments on this finding
to
> the publicly archived TAG mailing list www-tag@w3.org (archive)."
> 
> Bryan has made and interesting post, and given the instructions in the
> draft finding his sending it to www-tag@w3.org is appropriate.  Still,
I'm
> tempted to change the draft finding to point to
> public-xml-versioning@w3.org and to follow up on Bryan's posting
there.
> Having the discussion of versioning split between two lists seems
worse
> than a consistent choice of either one, and I believe we've already
> established public-xml-versioning@w3.org.  What say you, other TAG
> members?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Noah Mendelsohn
> IBM Corporation
> One Rogers Street
> Cambridge, MA 02142
> 1-617-693-4036
> --------------------------------------
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Thursday, 27 July 2006 17:52:52 UTC