- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:12:18 -0500
- To: "Henry S. Thompson" <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
Hi Henry, On 2/21/06, Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote: > What did you have in mind that the TAG should be doing? Your FYI, I'm not a member of the WG, just an observer who brought this issue to the TAG. > issues > list correctly shows that the TAG asked you to add a statement about > WebArch and EPRs, and you did, and we accepted your resolution. . . Most of the TAG discussion under the endPointsRefs-47 banner was actually about "EPRs vs. URIs", which was a valuable discussion, but unfortunately not what the issue is about. What the issue is about is misuse of the HTTP protocol; "In a nutshell, it [ WS-Addressing - SOAP Binding] requires that the URI in the "Address" component of a WS-Addressing EPR be serialized into a wsa:To SOAP header, independent of the underlying protocol. IMO, a Web-architecture consistent means of doing this would be to serialize it to the Request-URI when using SOAP with HTTP, or the "RCPT TO:" value when using SOAP with SMTP, etc.." BTW, I just checked the TAG issues list[1] and noticed that there's an action on Vincent to invite me to a call! That's a good idea, but I haven't received an invite yet. If there's time at the plenary perhaps we can knock that one off though. I fly out early Friday morning [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#endPointRefs-47 Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 15:12:30 UTC