- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:24:36 -0600
- To: "'noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com'" <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Harry Halpin <hhalpin@ibiblio.org>, www-tag@w3.org
My instinct is to put this principle in a list of possibly useful theories about choosing tools for handling data. I don't fault the TAG for not being able to explain more clearly the muddy problems of data modeling and language application. Few have done this very well. Sadly, one of the pioneers who did give it a good try, Bill Kent, passed away recently as noted on the CG list. http://www.bkent.net/Doc/darxrp.htm I recommend the section on Reality and Tools. I believe these principles for web technology fall into a class of theoretical musings which some need and therefore guidance is given, but which are easy to misinterpret and misapply and therefore will be a source of confusion as well as clarity. Caveat emptor. len From: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com [mailto:noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com] Claude Bullard writes > We seem to be unclear about how to apply it and > even less clear about how to explain its application > to a non-information theory specialist. I hope that the new draft just posted will deal with some of these concerns [1]. I don't think the point is to explore in detail the nuances of Chomsky hiearchies or similar formal metrics of complexity. Rather, this is a finding that is intended to remind a broad audience of Web contributors that they should be thinking hard about a variety of ways in which complex or powerful languages can obscure the information being conveyed on the web.
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2006 14:24:46 UTC