- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2006 19:21:56 -0400
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-ID: <OFC69DAB1C.B44E58DD-ON852571D8.007D663F-852571D8.00805AE4@lotus.com>
First of all, thanks again to Dave for the truly heroic work on the versioning finding. This problem is as tough as they get IMO, and I think the drafts are making really steady progress. Still, as I've mentioned on a number of teleconferences, I have a number of concerns regarding the conceptual layering in the draft versioning finding, and some suggestions that I think will make it cleaner and more effective. Dan Connolly made the very good point that it is really only approriate to raise such concerns in the context of a detailed review of what has already been drafted. So, I've tried to do that. A copy of my annotated version of the July 26 draft is attached. I've taken quite a bit of trouble over these comments, which are quite extensive, and while I'm sure that they will prove to be only partly on the right track, I hope they will get a detailed review not just from Dave but also from other concerned TAG members. Anyway, what I've done is to take Dave's July 26th draft and add comments marked up using CSS highlighting. These are in two main groups: 1) An introductory section sets out some of the main architectural issues and ideas that I've been trying to convey. I don't expect these will seem entirely justified until you read the rest of the comments (if then), but I think it's important to collect the significant ideas, and to separate them from the smaller editorial suggestions. 2) I've gone through about the first third of Dave's draft, inserting detailed comments. Some of these are purely editorial, but most of them are aimed at motivating and highlighting the concerns that led me to propose the major points in that introductory chapter. Indeed, I've tried to hyperlink back from the running comments to the larger points, as I think that helps to motivate them. No editor working on a large draft entirely welcomes voluminous comments, especially ones that have structural implications. Dave: I truly hope this is ultimately useful, and I look forward to working with you on it. Where possible, I've tried to suggest text fragments you can steal if you like them. I actually am fairly excited, because working through Dave's draft has helped me to crystalize a number of things about versioning in my own mind. I think we're well along to telling a story that's very clean, very nicely layered, and perhaps a bit simpler and shorter than the current draft suggests. I don't think it involves throwing out vast swaths of what Dave has drafted, so much as cleaning up and very carefully relayering some concepts. BTW: I will be around on and off until about Wed. afternoon, then gone until after US Labor Day weekend. Thanks again, Dave. Really nice work! Noah [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning-20060726.html -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 --------------------------------------
Attachments
- text/html attachment: versioning26July2006withNoahComments.html
Received on Monday, 28 August 2006 23:22:38 UTC