- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:44:46 -0500
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 2006-07-26 at 15:40 -0700, David Orchard wrote: > I've added the section I mentioned on partial understanding. [...] > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/versioning I started on my action from 8 August... ACTION: DanC to review definitions of partial understanding, backward compatible, and forward compatible http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2006Aug/att-0061/08-tagmem-minutes I got as far as updating the RDF derived from your UML/violet diagram http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ext-vers-uml.rdf <- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2006/ext-vers/ but I didn't get much further than that. I'm working toward checking my HTML 2/4 compatiblity scenario with these definitions. Some bookmarks, for (my) reference... live, the universe, and versioning http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/semantic-web/2006Aug/0083.html formally defining W3C's namespace change policy options w.r.t. recent TAG versioning terminology http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-swbp-wg/2005Sep/0136 -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Monday, 21 August 2006 20:45:09 UTC