- From: Avoid@gmail <avoid.spam.account@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 04:36:27 -0300
- To: <www-tag@w3.org>
From: http://chatlogs.planetrdf.com/swig/2006-08-09.html#T08-01-12 <Biblio> in many programming languages, in HTML, etc, we normally have to choose some way to escape content. question: wouldn't it be better to define say 5 or 10 extra, arbitrary characters, just to use them as universal escaping characters? <Biblio> (or even, if anyone envisions some other functionalities, as universal metacharacters?) <rudi> imagine writing a book and wanting to say "the escaping characters are: %$&" - how would you mark that sentence up? <Biblio> rudi, by repeating each metacharacter twice? <Biblio> we could probably use a second metacharacter as universal commenter <rudi> same problem - in a tutorial, you want to say "the universal commenter is %." without %. vanishing from the text :) <stain> even by passing it through several filters <Biblio> what if you repeat the metacharacter twice? <Biblio> you would have only two ocurrences: one metacharacter, then escape the following text; two, then print the metacharacter -------------------------- Universal Metacharacters Say a dozen (one for each F-key in keyboards). + 1 as universal commenter + 1 as universal escaper + 10 more for the future, unless somebody can think of some more uses already Comments? Fernando Franco
Received on Monday, 21 August 2006 07:37:03 UTC