- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:00:10 -0700
- To: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>
- Cc: "W3C TAG" <www-tag@w3.org>, "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>
Received on Friday, 11 August 2006 23:00:27 UTC
On 8/8/06, Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote: > Ian, the finding calls for the feature to be configurable by the user > and does not require a specific default. The feature could be as simple > as placing a little smiley/frowny icon in the corner of a window that > indicates whether or not the content is in error. If a site "breaks" > because of such behavior, then the browser implemented it wrong. > These "validation wars" have been raging since the early days of the Web and the answer has always been the same. I don't see how the lack of such a feature can be described as anything but inattention or low priority to standards compliance. Ian, surely this idea has arisen in your many discussions with browser vendors. What is their opposition to having a strict standards-compliance warning mode? Paul Prescod
Received on Friday, 11 August 2006 23:00:27 UTC