- From: T.V Raman <raman@google.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2006 13:59:26 -0700
- To: connolly@w3.org
- Cc: raman@google.com, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com, www-tag@w3.org
I thought I already did in my original note to Noah. Dan Connolly writes: > On Thu, 2006-08-03 at 13:25 -0700, T.V Raman wrote: > > > > *I agree with you on both your primary points, A) that we owe a > > reply quickly --- and B) that the disagreement is minor. > > > > However, as I've stated a few times during the call, I've > > experienced this kind of situation from "the other side " as it > > were, namely from inside WGs trying to get out a working, > > implementable specification, and in that context, I believe that > > as a ground-rule we as the TAG should only say "dont do X" if we > > have a reasonable "Do Y instead" proposal. > > Please suggest some text that would address your concern. > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E -- Best Regards, --raman Title: Research Scientist Email: raman@google.com WWW: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/ GTalk: raman@google.com, tv.raman.tv@gmail.com PGP: http://emacspeak.sf.net/raman/raman-almaden.asc Google: tv+raman
Received on Thursday, 3 August 2006 20:59:56 UTC