- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:35:40 +0200
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hi, while mulling over the current state of RDDL, which doesn't seem to have changed a lot recently (unless I missed something), I wondered if instead of XLink or the RDF variants proposed in its stead it wouldn't be simpler to just use a microformat. I'm not convinced it's a good idea, but I thought I'd dump it here in case anyone would be interested. From the RDF extraction point of view it's reasonably similar, but from the author's side it's much more friendly than XLink attributes that don't have the names of what they do. It also makes all the links directly usable by humans, without duplicating the metadata (as the RDDL example below does, using the same link twice). Instead of: <rddl:resource xlink:title="RELAXNG Schema" xlink:arcrole="http://www.rddl.org/purposes#schema- validation" xlink:role="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0" xlink:href="foo.rng" > <p>A RelaxNG Schema <a href="foo.rng">foo.rng</a> for FooML</p> </rddl:resource> one would use: ... <head profile='http://www.w3.org/2006/04/rddl'> ... <div class='rddl' title='The RelaxNG schema for FooML'> If you want to validate <a class='purpose' href='http://www.rddl.org/purposes#schema- validation'>validate</a> you can use the <a class='nature' href='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/ 1.0'>RelaxNG schema</a> found at <a class='locator' href='foo.rng'>foo.rng</a> </div> -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Monday, 17 April 2006 23:35:21 UTC