- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 01:35:40 +0200
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Hi,
while mulling over the current state of RDDL, which doesn't seem to
have changed a lot recently (unless I missed something), I wondered
if instead of XLink or the RDF variants proposed in its stead it
wouldn't be simpler to just use a microformat. I'm not convinced it's
a good idea, but I thought I'd dump it here in case anyone would be
interested. From the RDF extraction point of view it's reasonably
similar, but from the author's side it's much more friendly than
XLink attributes that don't have the names of what they do. It also
makes all the links directly usable by humans, without duplicating
the metadata (as the RDDL example below does, using the same link
twice).
Instead of:
<rddl:resource xlink:title="RELAXNG Schema"
xlink:arcrole="http://www.rddl.org/purposes#schema-
validation"
xlink:role="http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0"
xlink:href="foo.rng"
>
<p>A RelaxNG Schema <a href="foo.rng">foo.rng</a> for FooML</p>
</rddl:resource>
one would use:
...
<head profile='http://www.w3.org/2006/04/rddl'>
...
<div class='rddl' title='The RelaxNG schema for FooML'>
If you want to validate
<a class='purpose' href='http://www.rddl.org/purposes#schema-
validation'>validate</a>
you can use the
<a class='nature' href='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/
1.0'>RelaxNG schema</a>
found at
<a class='locator' href='foo.rng'>foo.rng</a>
</div>
--
Robin Berjon
Senior Research Scientist
Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Monday, 17 April 2006 23:35:21 UTC