W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > September 2005

[Fwd: simple case of IRIs for Components in WSDL 2.0] (abstractComponentRefs-37 )

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 15:23:31 -0500
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-Id: <1126297411.4430.302.camel@dirk>
I think there was some support for this position when we last
discussed abstractComponentRefs-37, but I don't think we
made any decisions.

So I just sent my personal view on how WSDL should map qnames to

Anybody agree? Disagree?

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

attached mail follows:


  C. IRI References for WSDL 2.0 Components

Those URIs are much more complicated than they need to be:


In the simple case, if there's only one component named CN in
a namespace TNS, then TNS#CN should be a standard URI for it.

e.g. given


 <interface name="SparqlQuery"

Then we should be able to use

to refer to that interface.

FYI, I think Henry made this argument in the TAG
regarding issue abstractComponentRefs-37


... for example at our june meeting.

Henry should get only credit, not blame, in case I'm misrepresenting
his position.

See also similar comments on XML Schema component designators...

simple barenames for schema component designators  31 Mar 2005

p.s. thanks to Bijan for helping me find the relevant part of the spec
in IRC discussion

Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Friday, 9 September 2005 20:23:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:09 UTC