- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:09:03 +0100
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Maybe I'm just being naive, but there's a particular point in our
discussion at the f2f about WSRF/EPR [1] (two or three pages down,
search for 'declaring the prefixes') which seems to me to offer a pretty
clean solution (to the problem of accommodating EPRs to WebArch),
namely using qnames as URI parameters to convey EPR parameters, e.g.
http://example.com/fabrikam/acct?wsaw:InterfaceName=fabrikam:Inventory
as the URI equivalent of the EPR (example 2.1 in [2]):
<wsa:EndpointReference
xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing"
xmlns:fabrikam="http://example.com/fabrikam">
<wsa:Address>http://example.com/fabrikam/acct</wsa:Address>
<wsa:Metadata
xmlns:wsdli="http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl-instance"
wsdli:wsdlLocation="http://example.com/fabrikam http://example.com/fabrikam.wsdl">
<wsaw:InterfaceName>fabrikam:Inventory</wsaw:InterfaceName>
</wsa:Metadata>
</wsa:EndpointReference>
I'm not _sure_ this example works, because I can't be sure what the
WSDL for the presumed service is -- it would have to bind the wsaw and
fabrikam prefixes. . .
Thoughts?
ht
[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2005/09/20AM-minutes.html#item04
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-wsdl-20050413/#refmetadatfromepr
- --
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
Half-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDS/GwkjnJixAXWBoRAiDIAJ48oatw9lIpPXOzE37OWIycDvVtrQCbBxcW
eH33AD7hcJ9/+K6vfEC6JFc=
=XqF0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2005 17:09:25 UTC