- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 18:09:03 +0100
- To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Maybe I'm just being naive, but there's a particular point in our discussion at the f2f about WSRF/EPR [1] (two or three pages down, search for 'declaring the prefixes') which seems to me to offer a pretty clean solution (to the problem of accommodating EPRs to WebArch), namely using qnames as URI parameters to convey EPR parameters, e.g. http://example.com/fabrikam/acct?wsaw:InterfaceName=fabrikam:Inventory as the URI equivalent of the EPR (example 2.1 in [2]): <wsa:EndpointReference xmlns:wsa="http://www.w3.org/2005/03/addressing" xmlns:fabrikam="http://example.com/fabrikam"> <wsa:Address>http://example.com/fabrikam/acct</wsa:Address> <wsa:Metadata xmlns:wsdli="http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl-instance" wsdli:wsdlLocation="http://example.com/fabrikam http://example.com/fabrikam.wsdl"> <wsaw:InterfaceName>fabrikam:Inventory</wsaw:InterfaceName> </wsa:Metadata> </wsa:EndpointReference> I'm not _sure_ this example works, because I can't be sure what the WSDL for the presumed service is -- it would have to bind the wsaw and fabrikam prefixes. . . Thoughts? ht [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2005/09/20AM-minutes.html#item04 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-ws-addr-wsdl-20050413/#refmetadatfromepr - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDS/GwkjnJixAXWBoRAiDIAJ48oatw9lIpPXOzE37OWIycDvVtrQCbBxcW eH33AD7hcJ9/+K6vfEC6JFc= =XqF0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Tuesday, 11 October 2005 17:09:25 UTC