- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 13:02:52 -0600
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 19:56 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote: > On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 19:48:25 +0100, Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> wrote: > >>> Re xlinkScope-23: What is the scope of using XLink? > >>> > >>> it seems that XLink is used for some, but not all links in WICD > >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051121/#link-activation > >> > >> We are not using XLink, SVG is. ;-) > > > > If that's intended as any more than a joke, could you clarify? > > The document you reference is the framework. It is intended not to be > language specific. (Section 2.3 needs some revision.) > > WICD is about XHTML referencing SVG (mostly), but that does not mean we > are using XLink for links. Well, to my reading, yes, it does mean that WICD uses Xlink for some links. I'd much rather leave people/groups aside and speak of technologies, btw. > We are just reusing XHTML and SVG as they are > defined. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 19:03:41 UTC