Re: a fly-by of Compound Document (WICD) specs w.r.t. TAG issues

On Tue, 2005-11-22 at 19:06 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 08:13:12 +0100, Dan Connolly <> wrote:
> > Re xlinkScope-23: What is the scope of using XLink?
> >
> > it seems that XLink is used for some, but not all links in WICD
> >
> We are not using XLink, SVG is. ;-)

If that's intended as any more than a joke, could you clarify?

Leaving people/groups aside, and assuming it's safe
to read WICD where you wrote "We"...

It's clear that the SVG spec includes some XLink stuff.
I got the impression that WICD includes some SVG stuff,
and that this is a transitive sort of inclusion, so
that WICD-as-drafted includes some XLink stuff. No?

Dan Connolly, W3C
D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541  0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E

Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 18:49:08 UTC