- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2005 01:13:12 -0600
- To: www-tag@w3.org
2005-11-21: The Compound Document Formats Working Group has released four Working Drafts: the Compound Document by Reference Framework 1.0, WICD Core 1.0, WICD Full 1.0, and WICD Mobile 1.0. http://www.w3.org/News/2005#item167 Re nsMediaType-3: Relationship between media types and namespaces? http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html?type=1#nsMediaType-3 and nearby mediaTypeManagement-45 they seem to take a conservative position; they're not mixing namespaces in this version: "Documents authored for WICD Mobile 1.0 should be associated with the application/xhtml+xml mime type." -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-WICDMobile-20051121/ Re xlinkScope-23: What is the scope of using XLink? it seems that XLink is used for some, but not all links in WICD http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051121/#link-activation Hmm... I wonder if WICD takes a position on issue contentPresentation-26: Separation of semantic and presentational markup, to the extent possible, is architecturally sound. Re XMLVersioning-41 I see "The group currently has no consensus on this proposal" in section 1.6 Identification and Versioning http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-CDR-20051121/#identification Hmm... UA-Profiles: wicd, foocd how are those grounded in URI space? is there a registry somewhere? seems relevant to standardizedFieldValues-51 Sorry this message is so scattered. I found this announcement during end-of-the-day random blog surfing. Rather than let it fall into the someday pile, I though I'd scribble a few relevant thoughts and hope for feedback. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Tuesday, 22 November 2005 07:13:59 UTC