- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:09:37 +0100
- To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
On Nov 16, 2005, at 13:25, Jonathan Borden wrote:
> We have received no comments on this. Does this mean that RDDL 1.0
> vs. RDDL 2.0 is really a non-issue, or is it worth updating RDDL to
> allow a simpler authoring style? Or is it that my July 4th weekend
> work got lost in the summer sun...
FWIW I think it's very much worth doing. The XLink version is too
cryptic to people who don't already have an experience with RDDL (or
links beyond XHTML href).
--
Robin Berjon
Senior Research Scientist
Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 14:09:24 UTC