Re: minutes TAG 8 Nov for review: namespaceDocument-8, XMLVersioning-41, etc.

On Nov 16, 2005, at 13:25, Jonathan Borden wrote:
> We have received no comments on this. Does this mean that RDDL 1.0  
> vs. RDDL 2.0 is really a non-issue, or is it worth updating RDDL to  
> allow a simpler authoring style? Or is it that my July 4th weekend  
> work got lost in the summer sun...

FWIW I think it's very much worth doing. The XLink version is too  
cryptic to people who don't already have an experience with RDDL (or  
links beyond XHTML href).

Robin Berjon
    Senior Research Scientist

Received on Wednesday, 16 November 2005 14:09:24 UTC