- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2005 10:34:23 -0500
- To: "'wangxiao@musc.edu'" <wangxiao@musc.edu>, www-tag@w3.org
"Saddam Hussein is a clear and present danger because he possesses and has demonstrated his willingness to use weapons of mass destruction." It is easy to assert things that you don't know. That isn't the issue. The issue is what resources are you willing to commit and what actions will you undertake based on things you don't know or haven't verified. This problem is a classic Schrodinger's Cat. You have to open the box and inspect the cat. Collapse the probabilities. It is your right to choose. In the case of URIs, they are intended to be opaque. How should one interpret that? a) They are not information bearing with respect to the resource they name. Therefore, they are not themselves, information resources. b) They are only information bearing in certain contexts but to know what that context is, you must first open the box, meaning, you must dereference another URI. They are information resources be it a name or an address (An identifier is a bogie. It is a value output from the process of identification. Down that road lies the bogs of type and class. Don't go there armed only with a URI.). Yet B is the best answer. Discovery/learning is a process we understand and which the architecture supports easily and naturally. So a sensible interpretation is that one uses the web just as one uses natural language, continuously (proceeding with a little information to get more information), cautiously (when in doubt, check and compare among resources), and responsibly (when using a URI, it is a best practice to put a resource at the location that URI can find that documents it). In other words, ask the cat and check its pulse. len From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of wangxiao > if I start making assertions about resource > "http://www.bbc.co.uk <http://www.bbc.co.uk> ", am I making > blind, potentially misleading or useless, assertions? I am curious, how can you assert something that you don't know. Also, I think the motto of SW is "everyone can say anything about everything". Your assertions are always going to be your viewpoint on that URI and won't reflect the viewpoint URI's owner anyway. Once again, "it doesn't matter". But I am just an observer, not a member, of the TAG. So, take my opinion with a grain of salt. :-) Xiaoshu
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2005 15:34:27 UTC