- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 22:31:23 +0200
- To: noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org, Paul Cotton <pcotton@microsoft.com>
Hi Noah, noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com wrote: > Anyway, I mention all this because it seems to bear at least indirectly on > the Binary XML discussion. At least one major vendor will be using zip'd > XML to achieve compression. To be honest I think the bearing is very indirect, if there is any bearing at all. Small to medium Office documents as are the target of these applications are the poster child of document types that should be expressed in XML, and the fact that they weren't already was an anachronism that I'm sure I'm not the only one to celebrate the progressive death of. I am not in the least surprised that zipping Office XML documents makes them slower than the binary formats they used to be encoded in. In fact, given even superficial knowledge of said binary format, I would have been shocked if that weren't the case. To be kind, it simply wasn't very good, and it's common lore that the people in charge of the Office file formats at Microsoft don't know what some parts of the formats are there for. I don't think we need to crowd the issue with a mention of the many XML formats that are happily in XML and use generic compression when needed :) -- Robin Berjon Senior Research Scientist Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Thursday, 30 June 2005 01:32:46 UTC