W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2005

Re: [httpRange-14] Resolved

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2005 00:39:27 +0100
Message-ID: <42B6022F.9010706@w3.org>
To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
Cc: Jan Algermissen <jalgermissen@topicmapping.com>, W3C TAG <www-tag@w3.org>

Tim Berners-Lee wrote:

> On Jun 19, 2005, at 4:30, Jan Algermissen wrote:
>> TAG members,
>> two immediate questions:
>> Given the resolution below, it is not good practice and not in sync  
>> with Web architecture
>> to issue a URI for a dog and have the server deliver 2xx responses,  
>> yes?
> If you refer to the thing as a dog, and your sever says 200 to an  
> HTTP get for it, one of you is wrong. It is an error.

OK, this seems like nice progress. I'll fix the FOAF namespace to avoid 
200 for
RDF terms, for now. I think it might be possible to agree that RDF terms 
are a sort of
information resource, but that's a separate debate, and one I'm happy to 
have on a more
relaxed schedule.

Received on Sunday, 19 June 2005 23:39:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:09 UTC