W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > June 2005

Re: WS Description and "safety"

From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 01:55:28 +0100
Message-ID: <42A64200.2040008@hackcraft.net>
To: www-tag@w3.org

Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> 2) The HTTP binding would take a dependency upon the safe attribute, and
> when the safe property is set to true, the HTTP method would default to
> GET, though this can be overridden when other considerations (e.g. data
> not easily serialized in a URI) apply.  This satisfied those who felt
> safety was important enough to not only remain in the family of
> Recommendations, but to have a real effect on the HTTP binding.

Can this go the other way, viz. an unsafe operation forced to use GET?

Jon Hanna

"I started to accept the mess I'm in. I know that mess spelled backwards 
is ssem and I felt much better armed with that information."
- Tori Amos
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2005 00:55:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:09 UTC