- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 01:55:28 +0100
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Jonathan Marsh wrote: > 2) The HTTP binding would take a dependency upon the safe attribute, and > when the safe property is set to true, the HTTP method would default to > GET, though this can be overridden when other considerations (e.g. data > not easily serialized in a URI) apply. This satisfied those who felt > safety was important enough to not only remain in the family of > Recommendations, but to have a real effect on the HTTP binding. Can this go the other way, viz. an unsafe operation forced to use GET? -- Regards, Jon Hanna "I started to accept the mess I'm in. I know that mess spelled backwards is ssem and I felt much better armed with that information." - Tori Amos
Received on Wednesday, 8 June 2005 00:55:34 UTC