- From: <paul.downey@bt.com>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2005 14:44:45 -0000
- Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <www-tag@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <2B7789AAED12954AAD214AEAC13ACCEF2709E071@i2km02-ukbr.domain1.systemhost.net>
slides for this morning's presentation:
WS-Addressing Overview
Joint W3C Meeting between WSAddressing WG and the TAG February 2005
*Motivation
<Web Services Addressing provides transport-neutral
mechanisms to address Web services and messages.>
- `Email' for Web Services
From
Reply-To
Correlation
Cookies
Other 'stuff'
*Two Specifications
- WS-MessageDelivery
Oracle, Arjuna, Cyclone, Enigmatec,
IONA, Nokia, seeBeyond and Sun
- WS-Addressing
BEA, IBM, Microsoft and Sun
- Fundamental building block to many other specs
*Deliverables
- Core specification
- Bindings for SOAP 1.1, 1.2
- Bindings for WSDL 1.1, 2.0
- Test suite
- 4 Working implementations for CR
*Timeline
- aggressive schedule
*Addressing Infoset
<wsa:MessageID> xs:anyURI </wsa:MessageID>
<wsa:RelatesTo RelationshipType="..."?> xs:anyURI</wsa:RelatesTo>
<wsa:To>xs:anyURI</wsa:To>
<wsa:Action>xs:anyURI</wsa:Action>
<wsa:From>endpoint-reference</wsa:From>
<wsa:ReplyTo>endpoint-reference</wsa:ReplyTo>
<wsa:FaultTo>endpoint-reference</wsa:FaultTo>
*Endpoint Reference (EPR)
- From, ReplyTo, FaultTo:
Address (IRI)
Reference Properties
Service Interface
Service Endpoint
Policies
*Architectural Issues
- Comparison of EPRs:
<This specification provides no concept of endpoint identity
and therefore does not provide any mechanism to determine equality
or inequality of EPRs and does not specify the consequences of
their equality or inequality. However, note that it is possible
for other specifications to provide a comparison function that is
applicable within a limited scope.>
- Multiple Transports
- Logical (v) Physical Address
- Dependencies on other specifications
Attachments
- application/pdf attachment: ws-addr-tag-overview.pdf
Received on Monday, 28 February 2005 14:45:26 UTC