W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2005

Re: C14N isn't widely used?

From: Elliotte Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:46:11 -0500
Message-ID: <421E4B23.6020102@metalab.unc.edu>
To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
CC: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, www-tag@w3.org

Rich Salz wrote:

> I don't know of any XML signature library that implements c14n without 
> also implementing exc-c14n.  

They're not exactly signature libraries, (There are uses for 
canonicalization other than signatures, after all. I use it for 
conformance testing) but XOM 1.0 and genx 1.0 implement canonical XML 
but not exclusive canonical XML. XOM 1.1 will add support for exclusive 
canonical XML.

Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:46:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:07 UTC