Re: C14N isn't widely used?

Rich Salz wrote:


> I don't know of any XML signature library that implements c14n without 
> also implementing exc-c14n.  


They're not exactly signature libraries, (There are uses for 
canonicalization other than signatures, after all. I use it for 
conformance testing) but XOM 1.0 and genx 1.0 implement canonical XML 
but not exclusive canonical XML. XOM 1.1 will add support for exclusive 
canonical XML.

-- 
Elliotte Rusty Harold  elharo@metalab.unc.edu
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!
http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xian3/
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0596007647/cafeaulaitA/ref=nosim

Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:46:16 UTC