Re: C14N isn't widely used?

Rich Salz wrote:

> I don't know of any XML signature library that implements c14n without 
> also implementing exc-c14n.  

They're not exactly signature libraries, (There are uses for 
canonicalization other than signatures, after all. I use it for 
conformance testing) but XOM 1.0 and genx 1.0 implement canonical XML 
but not exclusive canonical XML. XOM 1.1 will add support for exclusive 
canonical XML.

Elliotte Rusty Harold
XML in a Nutshell 3rd Edition Just Published!

Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 21:46:16 UTC