W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > February 2005

RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy

From: Dare Obasanjo <dareo@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:43:03 -0800
Message-ID: <830178CE7378FC40BC6F1DDADCFDD1D1043C5B50@RED-MSG-31.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Patrick Stickler" <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, "ext Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>
Cc: <www-tag@w3.org>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-tag-request@w3.org [mailto:www-tag-request@w3.org] 
> On Behalf Of Patrick Stickler
> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 12:42 AM
> To: ext Karl Dubost
> Cc: www-tag@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning 
> and Policy
> IMO, the introduction of xml:id reflects an increment in the 
> minor version of XML, and thus applications should be able to 
> refer to the version of XML prior to the introduction of this 
> attribute and the version of XML including this attribute in 
> a distinct manner.

In hindsight, this may have made sense but since this wasn't done to
differentiate XML 1.0 from XML 1.0 + XML namespaces it would probably
add much inconsistency to start doing it now. 

No matter how long or how hard you shop for an item, after you've bought
it, it will be on sale somewhere cheaper.   

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2005 19:43:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:07 UTC