- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <len.bullard@intergraph.com>
- Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:14:42 -0600
- To: 'Chris Lilley' <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: "'Pawson, David'" <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>, 'Jonathan Borden' <jonathan@openhealth.org>, "'www-tag@w3.org'" <www-tag@w3.org>
So you don't think they are replicated to the local machine along with the resources they specify even if the machine is only occasionally connected? Please pardon if I misunderstood your answer. len From: Chris Lilley [mailto:chris@w3.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2005 10:45 AM On Tuesday, February 22, 2005, 5:33:03 PM, Claude wrote: BCLL> On the other hand, it should evolve down to a BCLL> semi-stable set of stable DTDs or schemas that BCLL> can be replicated. Relying on an always connected BCLL> system is dicey. That is a recurring pattern of BCLL> network design: what to localize/replicate and BCLL> what to centralize/connect to. BCLL> Where do catalogs thrive? It seems to be a best BCLL> practice question worth thinking about. I think catalogs do best as a formalized and application-independent network cache.
Received on Tuesday, 22 February 2005 17:15:14 UTC