- From: Didier PH Martin <martind@netfolder.com>
- Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:08:53 -0500
- To: "'Roy T. Fielding'" <fielding@gbiv.com>, 'Michael Mealling' <michael@neonym.net>
- Cc: 'W3C TAG' <www-tag@w3.org>, colin.wallis@ssc.govt.nz, ferry.hendrikx@ssc.govt.nz
Hello Roy, I still do not see your point. Yes, you are right on the social issues. Nonetheless, locations independent naming schemas are better then location dependent schemas. I can move my data from a location to a new one and still use the same name. These people never said that this is the Holy Grail of the web, and please do not say that URLs are holy grails of the web too. It's probably the time for you to think twice about this. And I'll repeat myself: A location impendent schema is better than a location dependent schema, period. Come on Roy. Cheers Didier PH Martin
Received on Sunday, 13 February 2005 13:49:11 UTC