RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy

Roy wrote:
> Someone said that c14n contained instructions to treat all
> xml namespaced attributes as inherited.  That is a rather
> obvious error, assuming it actually says it (I haven't checked).

this is the crux of the matter for me - not that a new name was 
added to a namespace, rather that an assumption was made about 
the meaning of any new (unknown) names based upon which
way the cat had jumped when prodded before.

Received on Friday, 11 February 2005 09:18:37 UTC