www-tag@w3.org from February 2005 by date

Monday, 28 February 2005

• Status of issues/findings I 'own' Chris Lilley
• ws-addr overview for joint meeting with TAG slides paul.downey@bt.com

Sunday, 27 February 2005

• RE: Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 Rice, Ed (HP.com)
• RE: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Saturday, 26 February 2005

• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Dan Connolly
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Thursday, 24 February 2005

• Re: C14N isn't widely used? Elliotte Harold
• Re: C14N isn't widely used? Rich Salz
• C14N isn't widely used? Norman Walsh
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Norman Walsh
• RE: straw-man agenda for WS-A/TAG Joint Meeting noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Wednesday, 23 February 2005

• RE: straw-man agenda for WS-A/TAG Joint Meeting paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: straw-man agenda for WS-A/TAG Joint Meeting Mark Nottingham
• RE: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG Jonathan Borden
• DTDs, handling unknown elements [RDFinXHTML-35] Dan Connolly
• Re: "Protocol" (was Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Scope Stuart Williams
• Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG Stuart Williams
• Re: minutes TAG 22 Feb for review Stuart Williams
• Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG Dan Connolly
• Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG Henry S. Thompson
• Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG Henry S. Thompson
• Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG Henry S. Thompson
• Re: minutes TAG 22 Feb for review Stuart Williams
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Scope Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Dare Obasanjo

Tuesday, 22 February 2005

• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Karl Dubost
• Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding Karl Dubost
• Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding Karl Dubost
• minutes TAG 22 Feb for review Dan Connolly
• Re: RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference) Dan Connolly
• "Protocol" (was Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Scope Mark Baker
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Chris Lilley
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: [XMLVersioning-41] Scope David Orchard
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Rice, Ed (HP.com)
• RDDL->RDF (was Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference) Henry S. Thompson
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Chris Lilley
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference Vincent Quint
• RE: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference Rice, Ed (HP.com)
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Chris Lilley
• [XMLVersioning-41] Scope Bjoern Hoehrmann
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Pawson, David
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Stuart Williams
• RE: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Monday, 21 February 2005

• RE: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding David Orchard
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Henry S. Thompson
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Jonathan Borden
• Re: [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding Graham Klyne
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Jonathan Borden
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Jonathan Borden
• AWWW suggested erratum: Chris Lilley
• Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference Vincent Quint

Sunday, 20 February 2005

• [XMLVersioning-41] Comments and Suggestions on Draft Extensibility Finding noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Friday, 18 February 2005

• NoSuchMethodException: For extension function Denis
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Norman Walsh
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy David Orchard
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Elliotte Harold
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Draft agenda of 22 February 2005 TAG teleconference Vincent Quint
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bill de hÓra
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Norman Walsh
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Pawson, David
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Robin Berjon
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler

Thursday, 17 February 2005

• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Jonathan Borden
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Jonathan Borden
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Norman Walsh
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Harry Halpin
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Norman Walsh
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Norman Walsh
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Harry Halpin
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Robin Berjon
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler

Wednesday, 16 February 2005

• Re: Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 Rice, Ed (Portals Architect)
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy David Orchard
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Harry Halpin
• Clarification of MS support for the XML namespace (was RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy) Michael Champion
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Henry S. Thompson
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Robin Berjon
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Dare Obasanjo
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Robin Berjon
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• [Adding terms to a namespace] XML Events Bjoern Hoehrmann

Tuesday, 15 February 2005

• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Norman Walsh
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Norman Walsh
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Need permissions change on IRC Log (was: Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 (with XML Schema WG)) Dan Connolly
• Need permissions change on IRC Log (was: Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 (with XML Schema WG)) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Rice, Ed (Portals Architect)
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• DRAFT Agenda of 28 February TAG f2f meeting Vincent Quint
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: id is Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations) Tim Berners-Lee
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Didier PH Martin

Monday, 14 February 2005

• Draft Minutes of TAG Telcon, 7 Feb 2005 (with XML Schema WG) noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Didier PH Martin
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Didier PH Martin
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Agenda of TAG teleconference 14 February 2005 David Ezell
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Didier PH Martin
• Re: [deepLinking-25] Orbitz supposedly prohibits deep linking Anne van Kesteren
• Re: [deepLinking-25] Orbitz supposedly prohibits deep linking Paul Libbrecht
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Agenda of TAG teleconference 14 February 2005 David Orchard
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Roy T. Fielding
• [deepLinking-25] Orbitz supposedly prohibits deep linking noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Elliotte Harold
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Norman Walsh
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy (XMLVersioning-41) Dan Connolly
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy David Orchard
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Mark Baker
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Norman Walsh
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Didier PH Martin
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Didier PH Martin
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Karl Dubost
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Dan Brickley
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Robin Berjon
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Tim Bray

Sunday, 13 February 2005

• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Tim Bray
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Roy T. Fielding
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Jan Algermissen
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Didier PH Martin
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Mark Baker
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Daniel Veillard
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Daniel Veillard
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Elliotte Harold
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Elliotte Harold
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Daniel Veillard
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer

Saturday, 12 February 2005

• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer
• Re: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Elliotte Harold
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Daniel Veillard
• Re: Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Tim Berners-Lee
• Trying to assess the depth of xml:id and c14n incompatibilities Daniel Veillard
• RE: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Tim Berners-Lee

Friday, 11 February 2005

• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Karl Dubost
• Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Michael Mealling
• Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-hendrikx-wallis-urn-nzl-00.txt Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Agenda of TAG teleconference 14 February 2005 David Ezell
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bill de hÓra
• Re: Issue i001: what and how many things are we identifying? Hugo Haas
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Robin Berjon
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Patrick Stickler
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Jonathan Borden
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer

Thursday, 10 February 2005

• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bill de hÓra
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Robin Berjon
• Agenda of TAG teleconference 14 February 2005 Vincent Quint
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Dare Obasanjo
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Elliotte Harold
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer
• Re: Requirement 5 Norman Walsh
• Re: Requirement 5 Elliotte Harold
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy paul.downey@bt.com
• RE: Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace paul.downey@bt.com
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Roy T. Fielding
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Dare Obasanjo
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy David Orchard
• RE: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer

Wednesday, 9 February 2005

• Re: Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy Roy T. Fielding
• Re: Requirement 5 noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace Robin Berjon
• Re: Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace Robin Berjon
• Re: Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace L. David Baron
• Significant W3C Confusion over Namespace Meaning and Policy John Boyer
• Re: Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace Dan Brickley
• Request for new TAG issue: Adding terms to a namespace Norman Walsh
• Re: id is Candidate Recommendation (Call for Implementations) Bjoern Hoehrmann

Monday, 7 February 2005

• Possible new TAG Issue: relationship of URI schemes to protocols noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Friday, 4 February 2005

• Agenda: TAG Telcon 7th February 2005 Stuart Williams
• Re: Agenda for joint TAG/WS-Addressing Meeting at Feb. 2005 Technical Plenary noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Tuesday, 1 February 2005

• Re: Agenda for joint TAG/WS-Addressing Meeting at Feb. 2005 Technical Plenary noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Agenda for joint TAG/WS-Addressing Meeting at Feb. 2005 Technical Plenary Mark Nottingham
• endPointRefs-47 and identification (was Re: draft minutes TAG telecon 31 Jan 2005 Mark Baker
• Agenda for joint TAG/WS-Addressing Meeting at Feb. 2005 Technical Plenary noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Link to Steve Maine blog entry on End Point Reference Comparison noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Link to Steve Maine blog entry on End Point Reference Comparison noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Re: Link to Steve Maine blog entry on End Point Reference Comparison Bjoern Hoehrmann
• draft minutes TAG telecon 31 Jan 2005 Roy T. Fielding
• threading standards [was: Link to ...] Dan Connolly
• Re: Link to Steve Maine blog entry on End Point Reference Comparison noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com
• Link to Steve Maine blog entry on End Point Reference Comparison noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com

Last message date: Monday, 28 February 2005 15:38:42 UTC