- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 14:29:37 +0000
- To: www-tag@w3.org
Elliotte Harold wrote: > > The first paragraph in section 1 states that SQL is Turing complete. I > could be wrong about this, and it could depend on the dialect, but I > don't think SQL is Turing complete, at least not in its usual standard > incarnation. A quick Google search on "SQL Turing complete" turned up > these: It does depend on the dialect, some are Turing complete but the ANSI version isn't (or at least wasn't at one point).
Received on Tuesday, 20 December 2005 14:29:57 UTC