- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:21:28 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Cc: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
David Hull was kind enough to send this clarification to the dist-app
list, but I think it is also of interest as the TAG comes up to speed on
WS-Addressing.
Hmmm. First time I sent this the bullets in Dave's note disappeared as I
went from HTML to text mail. Here's a clearer version.
Thanks David!
--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------
----- Forwarded by Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM on 12/01/2005 03:14 PM
-----
David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org
12/01/2005 02:33 PM
To: xml-dist-app@w3.org
cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
Subject: EPRs, MAPs and MEPs
As there has been some confusion:
WSA defines two core concepts: Endpoint References (EPRs) and Message
Addressing Properties (MAPs).
* EPRs provide a data representation for a destination for messages.
Basically an IRI [address], [reference parameters] which are to be
attached to the message sent (as SOAP headers in the SOAP binding), and
[metadata], which is anything else of interest.
* MAPs are analogous to the usual email headers such as from: to:
reply-to:
message-id: and in-reply-to: and, as the name suggests, are properties of
the message. There is also an [action] MAP defined analogous to the
SOAPAction HTTP header.
As should be clear, a MAP is not the same as a MEP. The names are
confusing, but (one hopes) which one is meant should also generally be
clear from context.
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 20:21:52 UTC