- From: <noah_mendelsohn@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2005 15:21:28 -0500
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Cc: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
David Hull was kind enough to send this clarification to the dist-app list, but I think it is also of interest as the TAG comes up to speed on WS-Addressing. Hmmm. First time I sent this the bullets in Dave's note disappeared as I went from HTML to text mail. Here's a clearer version. Thanks David! -------------------------------------- Noah Mendelsohn IBM Corporation One Rogers Street Cambridge, MA 02142 1-617-693-4036 -------------------------------------- ----- Forwarded by Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM on 12/01/2005 03:14 PM ----- David Hull <dmh@tibco.com> Sent by: xml-dist-app-request@w3.org 12/01/2005 02:33 PM To: xml-dist-app@w3.org cc: (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM) Subject: EPRs, MAPs and MEPs As there has been some confusion: WSA defines two core concepts: Endpoint References (EPRs) and Message Addressing Properties (MAPs). * EPRs provide a data representation for a destination for messages. Basically an IRI [address], [reference parameters] which are to be attached to the message sent (as SOAP headers in the SOAP binding), and [metadata], which is anything else of interest. * MAPs are analogous to the usual email headers such as from: to: reply-to: message-id: and in-reply-to: and, as the name suggests, are properties of the message. There is also an [action] MAP defined analogous to the SOAPAction HTTP header. As should be clear, a MAP is not the same as a MEP. The names are confusing, but (one hopes) which one is meant should also generally be clear from context.
Received on Thursday, 1 December 2005 20:21:52 UTC