- From: Jon Hanna <jon@hackcraft.net>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:15:54 +0100
- To: "www-tag@w3.org" <www-tag@w3.org>
Quoting Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>: > > > > But people are going to assign bare, naked http: URIs to physical > > objects, dreams, and states of being. A robust system better be able > > to deal. > > Isn't that kind of throwing in the towel? Yes. Do it. Surrender http-range! :-) Maybe it's like saying > browsers should do their best to render everything they find ... vs > give an error for non-well-formed XML. Well there's a good argument for that too (personally I would like to see an error message with a best-attempt rendering *clearly marked as a best-attempt rendering* as *part of the error message*). Everything at purl.org has a redirect > > | in there already, and it seems to work fine. No reason why it should be, and the DC schemata cause IE to act weird (by IE criteria for "weird" though I haven't looked into exactly why). -- Jon Hanna <http://www.hackcraft.net/> "It is the most shattering experience of a young man's life when he awakes and quite reasonably says to himself, 'I will never play The Dane.'"
Received on Friday, 10 September 2004 14:16:00 UTC