- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2004 14:58:41 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-id: <87fz5rqnfi.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ ht@inf.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson) was heard to say: | Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM> writes: | |> I have used the URI 'http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Hoary_Marmot' to |> identify the Hoary Marmot (really, I'm serious[1]). If I GET a |> representation of that URI, I get some RDF that tells me things about |> the Marmot. I consider that data to be a representation of the |> physical creature. |> |> Assertions that http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Hoary_Marmot is a web |> page or has a particular creator or last modified date or |> what-have-you are inconsistent. | | This seems to me the crux -- on what basis do you assert they are | inconsistent? I'm appealing to your experience. Given two assertions: http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Hoary_Marmot is_a "Hoary Marmot" http://xmlns.com/wordnet/1.6/Hoary_Marmot is_a "web page" Your undertanding of what it means to be a Hoary Marmot (in particular that all such things belong to each of the following classes of things: marmots, rodents, gnawing animals, placental mammals, eutherian mammals, mammals, vertibrates, craniates, chordates, animals, organisms, living things, animate things, and physical objects) will lead you to conclude that those assertions are inconsistent. I could have made some additional statements to express explicitly that the set of hoary marmots and the set of web pages are disjoint, but I didn't bother. | How might I have figure that out for myself? You, the human being, relies on wetware. A machine is going to rely on...something else. The trick is not to make assertions that you can't prove, I suppose. | How might | my search engine have figure it out for _itself_? I have no idea. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Thursday, 9 September 2004 18:59:18 UTC