- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 12:28:07 -0500
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
- Cc: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>, www-tag@w3.org
On Wed, 2004-09-01 at 12:17, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > On Sep 1, 2004, at 7:42, <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Regarding the August 16 version of "Architecture of the World Wide Web" > > > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-webarch-20040816/#dereference-uri > > > > In section 3.1 it states: > > > > "The term Information Resource refers to resources that convey > > information. > > Any resource that has a representation is an information resource." > > > > While I understand the desire to introduce a term which enables people > > to speak directly about resources which are web-accessible, it seems to > > me that this particular term will provide more confusion than utility. > > > > Since *any* resource *can* (potentially) have a representation, the > > membership of the class of "information resources" is a reflection of > > the management, over time, of those resources, not any intrinsic > > characteristic of the resources themselves. > > Actually, the document uses the term "representation" only for the > relationship between an information resource and its Representation. > > If there is a dog, a picture of the dog, and a representation (bits and > metadata) of the picture, then the document would say that the dog is > the subject of the picture, that the picture has a representation in > the (bits + metadata). > > The document makes the distinction between a dog and the picture Does it? Which words in the document make that distinction? Though I tend to agree with you, TimBL, I don't think the document currently distinguishes between Patrick's view and yours. http://www.w3.org/TR/webarch/#information-resource http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-webarch-20040816/#information-resource > because it needs to (especially later on for semantic web things) even > though the HTTP spec doesn't really need to. > > So, in the terms of the document, only information resources have > representations. > There was a lot of confusion, expressed in last call comments, before > this distinction was introduced. An information resource is something > like a picture, text message, or poem, which conveys information. > > Tim BL -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 1 September 2004 17:28:06 UTC