Re: non-authoritative syntaxes for fragment identifiers

/ "Williams, Stuart (HP Labs, Bristol)" <skw@hp.com> was heard to say:
| Roy is right... our intent that *both* sentences be removed is recorded in
| the minutes from 18th Oct:
[...]
|> I thought we agreed to remove the second-to-last paragraph of 3.2.1:
|> <http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/webarch/#media-type-fragid>
|> 
|>     As with any URI, use of a fragment identifier component does not
|>     imply that a retrieval action will take place. Parties that draw
|>     conclusions about the interpretation of a fragment identifier
|>     based solely on a syntactic analysis of all or part of a URI do so
|>     at their own risk; such interpretations are not authoritative
|>     because they are not licensed by any specification 
|> (specifically [URI]).

Gone.

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.