W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2004

Re: WebArch draft, 14 Oct 2004

From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 15:11:01 -0400
To: www-tag@w3.org
Message-id: <87u0sreta2.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> was heard to say:
| On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 16:05, Norman Walsh wrote:
|> The webarch draft at
|>   http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/webarch-20041014/
|> reflects my best effort to incorporate all of the decisions reached at
|> the Basel f2f meeting along with editorial suggestions proposed by
|> several readers. I made another end-to-end editorial pass as well.
|> I am not aware of any outstanding decisions not reflected in this
|> draft, (which doesn't mean there aren't any :-)
| In 1.1 I still see
| "... in accordance with RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. However ..."
| Did you change your mind, or forget?
| "After discussion, it seemed that the use of these keywords in webarch
| is as appropriate as the use in RFC2119 itself. Concerns about
| "conformance" turned out to be misplaced; the constraints in RFC2119
| regard interoperability, and as such, the editor was advised to change
| the "however" in "in accordance with RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. However, ..."."
|   -- http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/05-07-tag.html#webarch-dc

I forgot. Now I look at it, I'm not sure what change I was advised to make.
Is it just to delete the word "However"?

                                        Be seeing you,

Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc.
NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.
If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by
reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 19:11:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:06 UTC