- From: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 14:02:36 -0400
- To: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-id: <87hdorj45f.fsf@nwalsh.com>
/ Stuart Williams <skw@hp.com> was heard to say: | Sandro Hawke wrote: | |>> "An "information resource" is a resource which constitutes a |>> body of information."? |>> |>> |> |>If the current text can be revised again without the worms all |>getting away, I would advocate that we already have a nice simple |>word with a close-enough dictionary meaning: "Document". |> |> | I can see them all on the starting line wriggling to get away... | | "Document" is a place we have been before. It suffers from some problems.... Oh, let's not go here again. This is a technical document. Words mean what we say they mean. Information resource, document, web resource, pericardium, ffarflbarger, the sequence of letters doesn't change the meaning. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM / XML Standards Architect / Sun Microsystems, Inc. NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
Received on Monday, 18 October 2004 18:03:13 UTC