W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-tag@w3.org > October 2004

Re: [Fwd: RE: "information resource"]

From: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 15:06:09 +0100
Message-ID: <41727C51.10605@eircom.net>
CC: www-tag@w3.org

Roy T. Fielding wrote:

> On Oct 15, 2004, at 8:10 PM, Mark Baker wrote:
>> ...
>> I continue to maintain that "information resource" is a pointless
>> concept.
> So do I, but I removed my objection to including it in webarch on
> condition that the reason for the definition also be provided, so
> that folks who don't care for the reason won't have to worry about it.

I hope that's the case. Frankly this entire exercise smacks of SUO 
or Cyc - classification of resources is not an area ripe for 
specification. I like it bettere when the TAG focuses on 
establishing engineering and architectural guidelines for the Web, 
not models of the universe.

Received on Sunday, 17 October 2004 14:06:57 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:56:06 UTC