Re: Draft minutes TAG f2f 6 Oct 2004

On Saturday, October 9, 2004, 1:56:50 AM, Dan wrote:


DC> On Oct 8, 2004, at 2:41 PM, Chris Lilley wrote:
>> On Friday, October 8, 2004, 8:31:38 PM, noah wrote:
DC> [...]
>> nuic> I've elaborated a bit but I think this was the spirit of my 
>> comment. Might
>> nuic> this be added to the official minutes?  Thank you!

DC> Noah, did you send that before I made my offer draft summarized minutes?

I thought that those were in addition to the fuller minutes?

>> I recall you saying things along these lines and have no objection to
>> that passage being added to the minutes.

DC> Chris, your draft minutes were attached to email; I saw some mail from
DC> you about re-running the script. I suggest that's probably not 
DC> worthwhile.

Whichever way makes people feel there is an accurate record and we get
the minutes approved.

DC> I'm only about 1/3rd done, but you can get a feel for the sort of 
DC> summary
DC> I'm working on; I'm doing it in-place on the agenda page:

DC> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/10/05-07-tag
DC> $Revision: 1.19 $ of $Date: 2004/10/08 22:57:16 $

DC> Noah, I hope you can double-check to see if your comment still
DC> applies when I've summarized the relevant part of the meeting.





-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group

Received on Saturday, 9 October 2004 00:16:41 UTC