Re: Draft minutes TAG f2f 5 October 2004, basel, Switzerland.

Here are a few suggested corrections to the portion of the minutes that I 
Scribed on morning of Oct-5.

In the discussion of work on versioning and schemas:

<current>
PC: Right, it's Noah's headache now. He's on schema.
</current>

In retrospect, a more accurate scribing of Paul's comment might be:

<proposed>
PC: Noah's in a good position to help with Schema WG liaison now that he's 
on both TAG and Schema.
</proposed>

The original scribing could have been misinterpreted as suggesting that I 
take over David Orchard's leadership role on the versioning finding.  That 
wasn't discussed, I don't think it's what was intended, and FWIW I'm not 
particularly anxious for that to happen.  Dave's doing a great job, IMO, 
though of course I'll be glad to help where I can.

Typo:
<current>
"A specification should devote the benefits or costs of providing 
extensibility" 
</current>
<proposed>
"A specification should discuss the benefits or costs of providing 
extensibility"
</proposed>


Typo:
<current>
"should the keywords in Query be extensibility" 
</current>
<proposed>
"should the keywords in Query be extendable?" 
</proposed>

I note that in the latter part of the minutes, Chris entered: "scribe 
norm", but norm scribed under the nom de plume "normndw".  Is it worth 
rerunning the HTML generator after zapping that?

--------------------------------------
Noah Mendelsohn 
IBM Corporation
One Rogers Street
Cambridge, MA 02142
1-617-693-4036
--------------------------------------








Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Sent by: www-tag-request@w3.org
10/05/2004 12:05 PM
Please respond to Chris Lilley

 
        To:     www-tag@w3.org
        cc:     (bcc: Noah Mendelsohn/Cambridge/IBM)
        Subject:        Draft minutes TAG f2f 5 October 2004, basel, Switzerland.


Hello www-tag,

  Minutes attached.

-- 
 Chris Lilley                    mailto:chris@w3.org
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 Member, W3C Technical Architecture Group