Re: too positive on extensibility [was: random comments on 2nd LC of WebArch] from Dominique Hazaël-Massieux on 2004-10-05 (www-tag@w3.org from October 2004)

From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 16:25:36 +0200
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: www-tag@w3.org, public-webarch-comments@w3.org
Message-Id: <1096986336.3137.115.camel@cumulustier>

Le mar 05/10/2004 Ã  15:14, Chris Lilley a Ã©crit :
> please see the new introductory text at
> http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/webarch-20040928/Overview.html#ext-version
>
> We believe this addresses your concern; do you agree?

I'll pass it to the QA WG; I expect that you should hear a reply from us
by Monday EOB. Thanks,

Dom
-- 
Dominique HazaÃ«l-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org

Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2004 14:26:24 UTC