- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2004 08:55:26 +0200
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-tag@w3.org
- Message-Id: <899980A5-169B-11D9-9783-000D9338C596@w3.org>
On Sep 29, 2004, at 3:21 PM, Norman Walsh wrote: > As promised, I've checked in an editor's draft of the WebArch document > for review at our face-to-face meeting. I don't plan to make any more > changes before then. I just finished a top-to-bottom (Well, OK, I got a little tired toward the end) read on the plane; I tried to focus on the new text, but I didn't have the diff-marked version cached, and it's been a while since I read it top-to-bottom, so many of these comments are probably out of order; i.e. I have probably requested changes to text that I've already agreed is done. Oops. I've flagged the comments that I think merit group discussion. I'd be grateful if the editor found time to consider the other suggested text, and pleasantly surprised if he spent some time considering the comments where I wasn't inspired to suggest anything concrete. This review is brought to you by OmniOutliner. They get a gold star for clean XHTML export and another for XML-based native format (Apple plist format is *almost* RDF; see http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/util/plist2rdf.xsl hmm... order...). > The draft is at[*]: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/webarch-20040928/Overview.html > > There is a diff version from the CR draft at: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/2004/webarch-20040928/diff-20040816.html -- Dan, aboard Continental #78, still getting used to the OS X mailer
Attachments
- text/html attachment: webarch-28sep-comments.html
- application/octet-stream attachment: webarch-28sep-comments.ooutline
Received on Tuesday, 5 October 2004 06:55:29 UTC