- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 07:22:30 -0600
- To: Stuart Williams <skw@hp.com>
- Cc: "Ian B. Jacobs" <ij@w3.org>, www-tag@w3.org
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 03:58, Williams, Stuart wrote: > Hello Ian, > > > 2.1 Formal approval of Qname finding > > > > * [13]qnameAsId-18 > > + 14 Jan 2004 draft finding "[14]Using Qualified Names (QNames) > > as Identifiers in Content" > > > > [13] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/issues.html#qnameAsId-18 > > [14] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/doc/qnameids-2004-01-14 > > > > At the ftf meeting we did not formally approve NW's finding. Proposed > > to publish the 14 Jan draft as an approved finding using the usual > > mechanisms. > > It's my recollection that we did infact approve the finding Sounds right here. > - however the > meeting record [a] does not seem to record that decision :-( > > I raised the question of publishing approved TAG findings as TR page (WG) > Notes. That discussion did not resolve. > > As things stand it seems that we should publish the approved finding in our > 'traditional' manner. > > If recollections differ on approval then we can make the decision again, > sigh. I'd rather that the ftf record showed a decision to approve the finding. > Otherwise, we should simply ask Norm to 'fix-up' the status section > and announce the revision as normal. > > > -- > > Ian Jacobs (ij@w3.org) http://www.w3.org/People/Jacobs > > Tel: +1 718 260-9447 > > Stuart > -- -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?
Received on Monday, 15 March 2004 08:21:20 UTC